Goalysis
2026-10-13

Football Analysis – 2026-10-13

Daily football match analysis for 2026-10-13 with signal scores and risk flags.

Introduction

Football match analysis for 2026-10-13 using Goalysis signals. Signal fit scores (0–100) indicate alignment between form, H2H patterns, and the selected analysis type. Higher scores suggest more consistent signals.

Top Matches Today (4)

Sabah FK vs SK Slavia Praha
Mixed SignalGeneral Analysis
CL·2026-10-13·Moderate Alignment: 65/100
Recent form
Sabah FK form (last 1): 0W-0D-1L. SK Slavia Praha form (last 1): 0W-0D-1L.
Home goals (last 5): 0 · Away goals (last 5): 2
Head-to-head
No recent finished head-to-head sample was available.
Goal trends
Sabah FK have gone over 2.5 goals in 1 of their last 1 matches, and both teams scored in 0 of those games. SK Slavia Praha show 1/1 over 2.5 matches with BTTS landing 1/1.
Why
SK Slavia Praha's offensive output is more reliable. Sabah FK concede at a higher rate. Both sides regularly produce matches above the goal threshold. Data shows mixed alignment across indicators. This means the signal should be treated with moderate confidence. Current goal rates are high but head-to-head meetings do not reflect this
Signal breakdown
Form signal → balanced between teams
H2H signal → no historical data available
Goal trends → support the signal
Alignment is present but not uniform across all sources.
Key insight
Current form and historical data diverge, reducing interpretive confidence
FC Internazionale Milano vs Club Brugge KV
Mixed SignalGeneral Analysis
CL·2026-10-13·Moderate Alignment: 55/100
Recent form
FC Internazionale Milano form (last 5): 3W-1D-1L. Club Brugge KV form (last 1): 0W-0D-1L.
Home goals (last 5): 3, 2, 5, 1, 3 · Away goals (last 5): 2
Head-to-head
No recent finished head-to-head sample was available.
Goal trends
FC Internazionale Milano have gone over 2.5 goals in 5 of their last 5 matches, and both teams scored in 4 of those games. Club Brugge KV show 1/1 over 2.5 matches with BTTS landing 1/1.
Why
FC Internazionale Milano outperform Club Brugge KV in recent results. FC Internazionale Milano produce more attacking output per match. Club Brugge KV allow more goals per match on average. Goal-heavy fixtures are common for both teams. Signals partially align but with notable inconsistencies. This creates only moderate alignment. Current goal rates are high but head-to-head meetings do not reflect this
Signal breakdown
Form signal → FC Internazionale Milano stronger
H2H signal → no historical data available
Goal trends → support the signal
Signals partially align, with some inconsistency.
Key insight
Strong form from FC Internazionale Milano pairs with above-average goal production
Racing Club de Lens vs Sporting Clube de Portugal
Mixed SignalGeneral Analysis
CL·2026-10-13·Moderate Alignment: 40/100
Recent form
Racing Club de Lens form (last 5): 2W-1D-2L. Sporting Clube de Portugal form (last 5): 3W-2D-0L.
Home goals (last 5): 2, 1, 2, 3, 0 · Away goals (last 5): 3, 2, 1, 3, 2
Head-to-head
No recent finished head-to-head sample was available.
Goal trends
Racing Club de Lens have gone over 2.5 goals in 4 of their last 5 matches, and both teams scored in 4 of those games. Sporting Clube de Portugal show 3/5 over 2.5 matches with BTTS landing 4/5.
Why
Sporting Clube de Portugal show stronger recent form than Racing Club de Lens. Sporting Clube de Portugal generate stronger attacking returns. Racing Club de Lens's defensive record is less reliable. Patterns align in some areas but remain uneven. This limits the reliability of any single interpretation. Current goal rates are high but head-to-head meetings do not reflect this
Signal breakdown
Form signal → Sporting Clube de Portugal stronger
H2H signal → no historical data available
Goal trends → support the signal
Some indicators agree while others diverge.
Key insight
Sporting Clube de Portugal's form advantage coincides with elevated goal rates
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs Bolton Wanderers FC
Weak SignalGeneral Analysis
ELC·2026-10-13·Low Alignment: 30/100
Recent form
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC form (last 5): 2W-1D-2L. Bolton Wanderers FC form (last 5): 2W-0D-3L.
Home goals (last 5): 0, 1, 1, 2, 2 · Away goals (last 5): 1, 4, 1, 2, 0
Head-to-head
No recent finished head-to-head sample was available.
Goal trends
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC have gone over 2.5 goals in 2 of their last 5 matches, and both teams scored in 2 of those games. Bolton Wanderers FC show 4/5 over 2.5 matches with BTTS landing 3/5.
Why
Bolton Wanderers FC concede at a higher rate. The low score reflects conflicting signals across data sources. This reduces reliability of the signal. Current goal rates are high but head-to-head meetings do not reflect this
Signal breakdown
Form signal → Wolverhampton Wanderers FC weaker
H2H signal → no historical data available
Goal trends → support the signal
No coherent pattern emerges from the available data.
Key insight
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC's consistency and high goal frequency reinforce each other
Low Signal Matches (2)Expand to view

These matches show low reliability signals. Treat with caution.

Millwall FC vs Swansea City AFC
Weak SignalGeneral Analysis
ELC·2026-10-13·Low Alignment: 30/100
Form: Millwall FC: 2W-2D-1L | Swansea City AFC: 3W-1D-1L
H2H: 1 of last 5 matches over 2.5 goals, 2 of 5 BTTS
Goals: Millwall FC: 4/5 over 2.5 | Swansea City AFC: 4/5 over 2.5
Both teams frequently exceed the goal threshold. The low score reflects conflicting signals across data sources. This means the signal carries limited interpretive weight. Current goal rates are high but head-to-head meetings do not reflect this
Swansea City AFC's form advantage coincides with elevated goal rates
Wrexham AFC vs West Bromwich Albion FC
Weak SignalGeneral Analysis
ELC·2026-10-13·Low Alignment: 3/100
Form: Wrexham AFC: 1W-3D-1L | West Bromwich Albion FC: 2W-1D-2L
H2H: 2 of last 2 matches over 2.5 goals, 2 of 2 BTTS
Goals: Wrexham AFC: 2/5 over 2.5 | West Bromwich Albion FC: 0/5 over 2.5
Wrexham AFC allow more goals per match on average. The low score reflects conflicting signals across data sources. This weakens confidence in the observed direction. Form and historical data point in different directions
Form and head-to-head signals contradict each other, weakening the reading

How to interpret these signals

Signal fit scores (0–100) indicate alignment between form, H2H patterns, and the selected analysis type. Higher scores suggest more consistent signals.